Kudos To Indiana’s Anti-Discrimination Law

ShareEmail this to someoneShare on Facebook7Share on Google+0Digg thisShare on LinkedIn0Share on Reddit0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Tweet about this on Twitter

Kudos To Indiana’s Anti-Discrimination Law

Governor Mike Pence and the people of Indiana deserve accolades for deciding to put “people above politics.” A blow against intolerance and discrimination from anyone makes America a better place for everyone! The left’s bigotry against people of faith is unacceptable! It’s about time that those of us on the right align with Democrat Sen. (then Rep) Chuck Schumer, deceased Sen. Ted Kennedy, former President Bill Clinton and nineteen other states to stop it!

The hoopla created by the left over RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act) is so over the top I thought they may have mistook the word “Indiana” for “Iran” or “ISIS,” seeing as though those “I” words and Obama’s inability to deal with them convincingly should’ve inspired genuine outrage from his party. Leftist and Democrats have always been the “party of hate.” So why should we expect anything different than intolerance towards those of us who believe in freedom of choice, freedom of conscience, freedom of expression,  freedom of speech and freedom of religion? With the exception of the 1993 RFRA law, the left is merely being consistent!

Democrats are the party of slavery, the Ku Klux Klan, anti-civil rights for minorities and Planned Parenthood founder and eugenicist Margaret Sanger – who desired to wipe blacks and minorities from the face of the earth under the guise of “women’s rights.” Currently, the left supports our president who is desperate to negotiate nuclear ambitions with the Mullahs of Iran. Who happen, by the way, to despise gays, lesbians, women and other groups of faith to death. Were it not for hate, democrats are void of a party platform and ideals. That’s why they’re recycling Hillary Clinton. They had to reach back more than a quarter century in hopes of “new” ideas. Hillary is a bad candidate for 2016 and liberals know it. Absent of ideas, the only chance they stand of maintaining the White House is creating chaos in the hopes that conservatives will stay home and Millenials will come out to vote.

It’s important to understand what the LGBT community really wants. It is in fact “extra rights” not “equal rights.” Think about it. As men and women, heterosexuals and homosexuals have the same rights under God and our constitution. What they’d like are additional provisions based upon who they decide to sleep with. The only ones standing in their way of feeling “accepted” by society as a whole are people of genuine faith. Therefore, Christians must be vilified and demonized in order for them to “feel” not only accepted, but “morally accepted.” In their minds, civil rights trump religious rights, because religion hinders them from feeling moral. They’re willing to accept God on their terms. This is why the left can get away with trumpeting their faith without living it out.

What left-wing media wants is to feel significant. That’s why they don’t report the news, they make it. By framing any opposition of their own bigotry and intolerance against those who disagree with them as “anti-gay” they’ve been able to invoke sympathy in the hearts and minds of American citizens who frankly, aren’t capable of critical thinking and are ignorant of the law itself. A law which ironically originated with Democrats.

In order for gays and lesbians to feel good about their immoral behavior in the face of a holy God, they must undermine Christianity, the constitution and common sense. By using protest, leftists have effectively silenced many of us who believe in God and the rule of law. Its submission by coercion. When President Obama said he wanted to fundamentally transform America some of us took him seriously. Leftists certainly did, as they march to his orders even at the expense of their own freedoms. How better to put the constitution on defense than by questioning its moral underpinnings and many of the so called “Christians” that founded this nation?

If you’ve read RFRA you understand all it does is protect the first freedoms of American citizens from unnecessary and unreasonable government coercion. The fact that Mike Pence could not communicate this simple truth lets me know that conservatives like myself dodged a bullet, as his name was being bantered about as a possible presidential candidate for 2016. The left has made that all but impossible for him. That’s a good thing!

Republicans cannot afford to have anyone incapable of persuasively communicating our principles in a soundbite-social media age. Unfortunately for the left, but fortunate for us on the right, they’ve insured that only the best communicators of the GOP will rise to the top of the field during this election season. I’d put a great communicator against Hillary’s screeching or Elizabeth Warren’s hate mongering any day of the week.

Share This Post

5 Comments - Write a Comment

  1. Dear Mr. Jackson:

    I loved your article about Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act. I agree with you whole-heartedly. Thank-you for expressing what millions of U.S. citizens are thinking and feeling. The leftists liberals label people of faith bigots and intolerant while ignoring their own boorishness and intolerance.

    Thank-you again for an excellent article that gets to the crux of the matter.

    Sincerely,
    Babette Plana
    (Google Plus)

    Babette Plana
    (google plus)

    Reply
    1. Hey Babette! Thank you for your readership. We’ll prevail on more issues like RFRA as long as we have a competent conservative that can communicate.

      God Bless You,
      Carl Jackson

      Reply
  2. Mr. Jackson,

    Conservatives keep bringing up that the Democrat Party of old American history was responsible for slavery, the Ku Klux Klan, Margaret Sanger, etc… with just a Wiki search, or a little bit of research on your guys’ part, you guys could easily clear up the misconceptions and political twists that played a part in your guys’ confusion. To associate today’s “New Democrats” with the old, Conservative Democrats of history, is as folly as associating today’s Christians with the Christians of the Inquisition, the Crusades, and especially of the Salem Witch Trials.

    Since a lot of people like Wikipedia, here you go:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Democratic_Party#The_South_becomes_Republican

    * John F. Kennedy, Democrat, embracing the Civil Rights Movement, started turning the South and Conservatives (the people generally regarded as “racists”) away from the Democrat Party.
    * President Lyndon B. Johnson, Democrat, signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, having fully pushed Southerners and Conservatives away, for good, and over to the Republican Party.
    * Abraham Lincoln, Republican, stated, “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause.”

    So you can paint today’s New Democrats with the paint of deceased men, but the fact remains that LIBERAL Democrats and Republicans have a history of supporting human rights, and CONSERVATIVE Democrats and Republicans have a history of stomping on them (or only swaying to see a mission accomplished).

    Margaret Sanger denounced the Nazi’s tactics in implementing Eugenics, did you know that? She was also praised by Martin Luther King, Jr, for her work with minorities, when he accepted the Margaret Sanger Award in 1966, did you know that? It has been an issue of politics to paint Margaret Sanger as some evil monster (surely put forth by Conservatives who were morally opposed to abortion, and nothing more). The idea that she was racist (at least, moreso than Democrat/Republican society in that time) is primarily propagated by Conservatives who don’t take the time to research her.

    To note, you incessantly invoke your version of God to support your political beliefs. Frankly, the American public is protected against religious law (yes, including your religion – not just protection against Islamic religion), with the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights in place. Protection against religious law, for all Americans, is ultimately what allows you to keep practicing your religion. If we accepted Christians to implement law in the US, then we could also accept Muslims implementing law in the US. No one, except fundamentalist Muslims, would accept Islamic law. No one, except fundamentalist Christians, would accept Mosaic law.

    Finally, Christians preaches that Christianity no longer goes by the old laws of religion, since you guys claim that Christianity is “faith”, not “religious law”. Why do you guys then contradict yourselves, by trying to implement religious law onto the liberal Christians who don’t agree with you, and the nonbelievers, who don’t feel that your religious laws have any place in our Great Society? (Research the Conservative Southern Democrats who were lost due to the implementation of the Democratic Great Society.)

    Reply
    1. Hey Steven,
      click on No Mo’ at the top of my website. Democrat philosophy is inherently racist. You’ll find the facts there.

      Reply
    2. Are you serious? You’re handing me research from a liberal Wikipedia? Everyone has a value system. The better question is “why is it that liberal Christians, atheists and secularists try to impose their worldview on a ‘Judeo-Christian’ society?” Keep researching. Thanks for your comment.

      Reply

Post Comment